No Benefit of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Metastatic EGFR Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Non-ASPS articles which could be relevant.
Post Reply
D.ap
Senior Member
Posts: 4137
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:19 am

No Benefit of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Metastatic EGFR Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Post by D.ap »

No Benefit of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Metastatic EGFR Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer



http://www.primeoncology.org/primelines ... PrimeLines
Debbie
D.ap
Senior Member
Posts: 4137
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:19 am

Pitfalls in immunohistochemical assessment of EGFR expression in soft tissue sarcomas

Post by D.ap »

Abstract

Background: New targeted cancer treatments acting against growth factor receptors such as the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) necessitate selecting patients for treatment with these drugs. Besides carcinomas, soft tissue sarcomas (STS) express EGFR and might thereby be a promising target for this new therapeutic strategy.

Objective: To test and compare different EGFR antibodies to determine the frequency of EGFR expression in STS.

Methods: 302 consecutive specimens of STS were examined using the tissue microarray technique. EGFR expression levels were assessed by immunohistochemistry using five different commercially available antibodies. Gene amplification status was measured by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH). Immunoreactivity and amplification status were correlated with clinicopathological features and follow up data available in 163 cases.

Results: EGFR expression frequency ranged between 0.3% and 52.9%, depending on the antibody and scoring method used. In all, 3.5% of the tumours showed egfr gene amplification by FISH, which correlated with EGFR expression for three antibodies. Only one antibody had independent prognostic value in multivariate analysis and correlated with an unfavourable outcome; egfr gene amplification status showed no correlation with clinical features.

Conclusions: Frequency of EGFR immunopositivity in STS strongly depends on the antibody used, and only one of five antibodies tested predicted an unfavourable clinical outcome. This indicates that choice of primary antibody and scoring system have a substantial impact on the determination of EGFR immunoreactivity.

http://jcp.bmj.com/content/59/6/585.short
Debbie
D.ap
Senior Member
Posts: 4137
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:19 am

Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies in cancer therapy

Post by D.ap »

ABSTRACT
The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor involved in the proliferation and survival of cancer cells. EGFR is the first molecular target against which monoclonal antibodies (mAb) have been developed for cancer therapy. Here we review the mechanisms underlying the effects of EGFR-specific mAb in cancer therapy. The efficacy of EGFR-specific mAb in cancer occurs thanks to inhibition of EGFR-generated signalling; furthermore, the effects of antibodies on the immune system seem to play an important role in determining the overall anti-tumour response. In this review, attention is focused on cetuximab and panitumumab, two mAb introduced recently into clinical practice for treatment of metastatic colorectal and head and neck cancer which target the external part of EGFR.



https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articl ... po=7.74648
Debbie
Post Reply

Return to “Other Publications”