I don't quite know what to say to that. I assure you that what I said is NOT a given to many people and not everyone understands my points. We'll move anything not relevant to Lucio out of this thread to the lifestyle section. Everything else will remain in place. Also, I am not discouraging anyone from saying what they take. Where did you see me do that?skyflower wrote:ivan, i do not see how any of your comments can be construed as constructive. and please keep a record of these conversations here, these were all part of our next steps on proceeding with lucio's treatment before it degraded. everything that you have said is a given, everybody understands those points, but you are drilling it into our heads "not backed by science" as if that is the end all argument (like rheza with the noni). scientifically wouldn't you want to know what people are taking? to see if diet or supplements does play a role in this? but your arguments are not allowing people to be open about what is actually going on or how they are going about it, taking a drug or having a surgery is just one aspect of it. if people aren't open about what they are taking, then there is no record of what is or isn't working. as probably stated before, we're just aerospace engineers, medicine is not our field, but we are intellectually curious about this and wish this site was more open. abstinence only education does not work (even for nutritional supplements).
Do you think Rheza should drink that random stuff - because his RELATIVES recommended it? Well, they surely have absolutely no freaking idea about sarcoma, ASPS, and cancer treatment in general. They are probably illogical, irrational, emotionally involved people who are afraid to lose a loved one, and they are eager to believe uncorroborated stories of a new "miracle drug". These kinds of people are more likely to do more harm than good in trying to help. That's like reverting to witch doctors with mysterious potions boiling in cauldrons, and an average life expectancy of 35 years.
Ok, so suppose that every single member of this board reported what supplements they've ever taken, and you had a complete record of their cancer growth over those periods (I know this is not going to happen, but that's the ideal situation). How would you analyze this data to end up with a meaningful result on which you can base your decisions? I think there are simply too many unknown variables to devise anything useful. Everyone is trying different things, and their base progression rates are different.
What would you say to someone who suggested using ancient wisdom and word of mouth advice from a non-engineer instead of physics, calculus, and computer simulations, to calculate the wing cross section for a supersonic jet? In my opinion, that is absolutely equivalent to seeking alternative medicine advice in place of evidence-based medicine. Since, apparently, you disagree with me - please explain to me why you think that this is not so. Again, I am encouraging you to share your opinion, and continue discussion on this subject.