ABSTRACT
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are an important development in the treatment of advanced cancer. A substantial proportion of patients treated with ICI do not respond, and additionally patients discontinue treatment due to adverse effects. While many novel biological markers related to the specific mechanisms of ICI actions have been investigated, there has also been considerable research to identify routinely available blood and clinical markers that may predict response to ICI therapy. If validated, these markers have the advantage of being easily integrated into clinical use for nominal expense. Several markers have shown promise, including baseline and post-treatment changes in leucocyte counts, lactate dehydrogenase and C-reactive protein. While promising, the results between studies have been inconsistent due to small sample sizes, follow-up time and variability in the assessed markers. To date, research on routinely available blood and clinical markers has focussed primarily on ICI use in melanoma, the use of ipilimumab and on univariate associations, but preliminary evidence is emerging for other cancer types, other ICIs and for combining markers in multivariable clinical prediction models.
Keywords: immune checkpoint inhibitors, precision medicine, biomarkers, clinicopathological, melanoma
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5625676/
Predicting response and toxicity to immune checkpoint inhibitors using routinely available blood and clinical markers
Treatment response to ICI drugs uses different immune related response criteria and often represent the challenge for the radiologist to correctly evaluate the scan
Return to “Treatment response criteria and evaluation/scanning problems/rare cases”
Jump to
- Welcome to CureASPS.org!
- ↳ Guest Book
- ↳ Forum Issues and Suggestions
- News and Updates
- ↳ Personal Stories and Updates
- ↳ Success Stories
- ↳ Rest In Peace
- ↳ Anonymous Patient Updates
- ↳ Chinese group news
- ↳ Medical Publications
- ↳ Other Publications
- ↳ Sarcoma Meetings and Conferences
- ASPS Clinical Trials
- ↳ Other Clinical Trials
- ↳ COMPLETED - ARQ 197 Clinical Trial
- ↳ COMPLETED - Dana Farber Vaccine Clinical Trial (GVAX)
- ↳ Dasatinib
- ↳ Alisertib
- ↳ Cediranib
- ↳ Anlotinib
- ↳ Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)
- ↳ Axitinib and Pembrolizumab (Keytruda) in Miami, US
- ↳ TECENTRIQ (atezolizumab) by Genentech
- ↳ Pfizer's PF-06801591
- ↳ Durvalumab+Tremelimumab at MDACC
- Symptoms and Diagnostics
- ↳ Symptoms
- ↳ Scan Types and Follow-Up
- ↳ Molecular Studies
- ↳ Pathology results
- Primary Tumor Treatment
- ↳ Resection
- ↳ Treatment of Non-Resectable Primary Tumor
- ↳ Radiation
- Systemic Treatment
- ↳ TKI
- ↳ Sutent (sunitinib)
- ↳ Pazopanib
- ↳ Сabozantinib (Cometriq)
- ↳ Sorafenib
- ↳ Chemotherapy
- ↳ Metronomic chemotherapy
- ↳ Temozolomide (Temodar)
- ↳ Side effects of systemic treatments
- ↳ Interferon alpha
- ↳ Immune checkpoint inhibitors ICI (PD-1 and PD-L1 targeting drugs)
- ↳ Keytruda
- ↳ Opdivo
- ↳ TECENTRIQ (atezolizumab)
- ↳ Toxicity, problems and potentiation strategies
- ↳ Treatment response criteria and evaluation/scanning problems/rare cases
- ↳ treatment discontinuation/re-treatment
- Metastatic Disease Treatment
- ↳ Local treatment modalities
- ↳ cryoablation
- ↳ Side effects/complications of the local ablations
- ↳ Radiosurgery
- ↳ Microwave ablation
- ↳ High intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU)
- ↳ Lung Metastases
- ↳ Laser assisted surgery
- ↳ Brain Metastases
- ↳ Bone Metastases
- ↳ Other Metastases
- ↳ Abdominal Metastases
- ↳ Liver metastases
- ↳ Heart Metastases
- ↳ Spinal metastases
- ↳ Adrenal metastases
- ↳ Pancreatic metastases
- Living with ASPS
- ↳ Insurance Coverage
- ↳ Second opinion from a sarcoma center
- ↳ Finanical assistance
- ↳ Diet and lifestyle
- ↳ Related studies
- ↳ Pain management
- ↳ Travel assistance