Page 1 of 1
Cell cycle progression in response to oxygen levels
Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2019 5:06 pm
by D.ap
Abstract
Hypoxia‚ or decreases in oxygen availability‚ results in the activation of a number of different responses at both the whole organism and the cellular level. These responses include drastic changes in gene expression, which allow the organism (or cell) to cope efficiently with the stresses associated with the hypoxic insult. A major breakthrough in the understanding of the cellular response to hypoxia was the discovery of a hypoxia sensitive family of transcription factors known as the hypoxia inducible factors (HIFs). The hypoxia response mounted by the HIFs promotes cell survival and energy conservation. As such, this response has to deal with important cellular process such as cell division. In this review, the integration of oxygen sensing with the cell cycle will be discussed. HIFs, as well as other components of the hypoxia pathway, can influence cell cycle progression. The role of HIF and the cell molecular oxygen sensors in the control of the cell cycle will be reviewed.
Keywords: Hypoxia, CDKs, Proly-hydroxylases,
HIF, JMJC
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4143607/
Pleiotropic effects of HIF-1 blockade on tumor radiosensitivity
Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2019 7:31 pm
by D.ap
We have previously shown that radiation increases HIF-1 activity in tumors, causing significant radioprotection of the tumor vasculature. The impact that HIF-1 activation has on overall tumor
radiosensitivity, however, is unknown. We reveal here that HIF-1 plays an important role in determining tumor radioresponsiveness through regulating four distinct processes. By promoting ATP metabolism, proliferation, and p53 activation, HIF-1 has a radiosensitizing effect on tumors. Through stimulating endothelial cell survival, HIF-1 promotes tumor radioresistance. As a result, the net effect of HIF-1 blockade on tumor radioresponsiveness is highly dependent on treatment sequencing, with “radiation first” strategies being significantly more effective than the alternative. These data provide a strong rationale for pursuing sequence-specific combinations of HIF-1 blockade and conventional therapeutics.
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=mi ... egAi4eFIIJ
Pleiotropic effects of HIF-1 blockade on tumor radiosensitivity
Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2019 9:22 am
by D.ap
Through stimulating endothelial cell survival, HIF-1 promotes tumor radioresistance. As a result, the net effect of HIF-1 blockade on tumor radioresponsiveness is highly dependent on treatment sequencing, with “radiation first” strategies being significantly more effective than the alternative. These data provide a strong rationale for pursuing sequence-specific combinations of HIF-1 blockade and conventional therapeutics.
Pleiotropic effects of HIF-1 blockade on tumor radiosensitivity
https://www.cell.com/cancer-cell/fullte ... 05)00225-4
Re: Cell cycle progression in response to oxygen levels
Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 7:26 pm
by D.ap
SIGNIFICANCE
Radiation is used in treating approximately 500,000 cancer patients in the United States annually. Consequently, many people could benefit from the development of new ways to make tumors respond better to radiation. We recently found that a crucial regulator of gene expression in tumors, HIF-1, is activated by radiation. We undertook the current study to determine how HIF-1 activation influences tumor radiosensitivity. Our results suggest that HIF-1 blockade may be a very effective means of overcoming tumor radioresistance. However, because HIF-1 influences radiosensitivity in many complex ways, the success of this strategy requires specific timing of its blockade relative to when radiotherapy is administered. This work may help optimize the use of HIF-1 inhibitors with conventional tumor therapies.
Re: Cell cycle progression in response to oxygen levels
Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 8:32 pm
by D.ap
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=1684
Methods
For seven patients with confirmed primary or metastatic ASPS, RNA samples were isolated immediately following surgery, reverse transcribed to cDNA and each sample hybridized to duplicate high-density human U133 plus 2.0 microarrays. Array data was then analyzed relative to arrays hybridized to universal RNA to generate an unbiased transcriptome. Subsequent gene ontology analysis was used to identify transcripts with therapeutic or diagnostic potential. A subset of the most interesting genes was then validated using quantitative RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry.
Results
Analysis of patient array data versus universal RNA identified elevated expression of transcripts related to angiogenesis (ANGPTL2, HIF-1 alpha, MDK, c-MET, VEGF, TIMP-2), cell proliferation (PRL, IGFBP1, NTSR2, PCSK1), metastasis (ADAM9, ECM1, POSTN) and steroid biosynthesis (CYP17A1 and STS). A number of muscle-restricted transcripts (ITGB1BP3/MIBP, MYF5, MYF6 and TRIM63) were also identified, strengthening the case for a muscle cell progenitor as the origin of disease. Transcript differentials were validated using real-time PCR and subsequent immunohistochemical analysis confirmed protein expression for several of the most interesting changes (MDK, c-MET, VEGF, POSTN, CYP17A1, ITGB1BP3/MIBP and TRIM63).
Conclusion
Results from this first comprehensive study of ASPS gene expression identifies several targets involved in angiogenesis, metastasis and myogenic differentiation. These efforts represent the first step towards defining the cellular origin, pathogenesis and effective treatment strategies for this atypical malignancy.
https://bmccancer.biomedcentral.com/art ... -2407-9-22