Scar tissue drug dismantles cancer's defences to boost immunotherapy
University of Southampton
Immunotherapy has emerged as a powerful tool in the fight against cancer, but there are still many ways for the disease to elude its advances. One trick cancer cells use to evade an attack is to shield themselves behind a particular type of healthy cell, and scientists at the University of Southampton have found a new way to intervene in this process using a drug originally developed to treat scar tissue.
By leveraging the body’s immune defenses and supercharging their ability to attack cancer, immunotherapy has brought a range of options to the table when it comes to cancer treatment. One way it does this is by ramping up the effectiveness immune cells called lymphocytes, by enhancing their ability to infiltrate tumors and take out malignant cells.
But a lot of the time lymphocytes don’t make it through, with the tumor able to repel its advances and continue to grow. The University of Southampton scientists have been investigating the reasons why this occurs and why a lot of patients fail to respond to immunotherapy, and now believe they have some answers.
The team conducted experiments on mice with lung and colon cancers, observing how cancer cells can hijack a normal type of cell called a fibroblast, using it as a shield to hide from the lymphocyte attack. In these cases, they become known as cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), and scientists believe they play a pivotal role in preventing immunotherapy from working, with many solid cancers exhibiting a high concentration of these corrupted cells.
An enzyme called NOX4 was found through previous research to be key to the formation of CAFs, so the team set out to explore how they might inhibit its activity. In the mice experiments, the team blocked NOX4 both through genetic engineering and a drug called Setanaxib, which is currently being trialed clinically to treat the scarring of organ tissue.
The team found that this approach served to prevent or even reverse the formation of CAFs, leaving the tumors exposed and more susceptible to immune attacks. So much so, the team found that when the mice were treated with Setanaxib, it increased the immune cell penetration of the tumors by as much as ten times, reducing tumor size by more than 50 percent. When combined with various immunotherapies, the treatment reduced tumor size by as much as 75 percent and approximately doubled the survival times.
"Immunotherapy for cancer has been a very exciting development, but still doesn't work in most patients,” says study author Professor Gareth Thomas. “Our results suggest that in many cases, treatment resistance is caused by CAF, and we think this can be overcome by targeting NOX4. GKT137831 hasn't yet been tested on cancer patients, but we hope may give immunotherapy drugs a much better chance of fighting cancer cells effectively; this technique could hugely improve the success rate of cancer immunotherapy."
The team says the next steps are to see if these results can be replicated in humans. The University of Southampton team has also received funding from Cancer Research UK to begin investigating how it might improve immunotherapy treatments for breast cancer patients.
The research was published in the journal Cancer Research.
https://newatlas.com/medical/scar-tissu ... notherapy/
Scar tissue drug dismantles cancer's defences to boost immunotherapy University of Southampton
New research, clinical trial outcomes, etc.
Return to “Medical Publications”
Jump to
- Welcome to CureASPS.org!
- ↳ Guest Book
- ↳ Forum Issues and Suggestions
- News and Updates
- ↳ Personal Stories and Updates
- ↳ Success Stories
- ↳ Rest In Peace
- ↳ Anonymous Patient Updates
- ↳ Chinese group news
- ↳ Medical Publications
- ↳ Other Publications
- ↳ Sarcoma Meetings and Conferences
- ASPS Clinical Trials
- ↳ Other Clinical Trials
- ↳ COMPLETED - ARQ 197 Clinical Trial
- ↳ COMPLETED - Dana Farber Vaccine Clinical Trial (GVAX)
- ↳ Dasatinib
- ↳ Alisertib
- ↳ Cediranib
- ↳ Anlotinib
- ↳ Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)
- ↳ Axitinib and Pembrolizumab (Keytruda) in Miami, US
- ↳ TECENTRIQ (atezolizumab) by Genentech
- ↳ Pfizer's PF-06801591
- ↳ Durvalumab+Tremelimumab at MDACC
- Symptoms and Diagnostics
- ↳ Symptoms
- ↳ Scan Types and Follow-Up
- ↳ Molecular Studies
- ↳ Pathology results
- Primary Tumor Treatment
- ↳ Resection
- ↳ Treatment of Non-Resectable Primary Tumor
- ↳ Radiation
- Systemic Treatment
- ↳ TKI
- ↳ Sutent (sunitinib)
- ↳ Pazopanib
- ↳ Сabozantinib (Cometriq)
- ↳ Sorafenib
- ↳ Chemotherapy
- ↳ Metronomic chemotherapy
- ↳ Temozolomide (Temodar)
- ↳ Side effects of systemic treatments
- ↳ Interferon alpha
- ↳ Immune checkpoint inhibitors ICI (PD-1 and PD-L1 targeting drugs)
- ↳ Keytruda
- ↳ Opdivo
- ↳ TECENTRIQ (atezolizumab)
- ↳ Toxicity, problems and potentiation strategies
- ↳ Treatment response criteria and evaluation/scanning problems/rare cases
- ↳ treatment discontinuation/re-treatment
- Metastatic Disease Treatment
- ↳ Local treatment modalities
- ↳ cryoablation
- ↳ Side effects/complications of the local ablations
- ↳ Radiosurgery
- ↳ Microwave ablation
- ↳ High intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU)
- ↳ Lung Metastases
- ↳ Laser assisted surgery
- ↳ Brain Metastases
- ↳ Bone Metastases
- ↳ Other Metastases
- ↳ Abdominal Metastases
- ↳ Liver metastases
- ↳ Heart Metastases
- ↳ Spinal metastases
- ↳ Adrenal metastases
- ↳ Pancreatic metastases
- Living with ASPS
- ↳ Insurance Coverage
- ↳ Second opinion from a sarcoma center
- ↳ Finanical assistance
- ↳ Diet and lifestyle
- ↳ Related studies
- ↳ Pain management
- ↳ Travel assistance