Questions regarding success/failure of GVAX response
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 2:08 pm
Dear ASPS Community Friends,
I was very happy to read the entry on the Homepage from the parent of a clear cell carcinoma patient regarding his son's apparent successful response to the GVAX Immunotherapy Vaccine. It was so kind of the parent to share the information, and it is so wonderful to hear that the GVAX seems to have been effective in stabilizing the progression of his son's disease for two years, as also appears to have happened with ASPS patient Anthony Olsen. Heartbreakingly, this has not been the experience of several other ASPS patients who participated in the Clinical Trial who all experienced extensive and even aggressive post Clinical Trial disease progression, including our daughter Brittany. I don't understand why more follow-up isn't being done by the Dana Farber GVAX research team to try to determine why a few patients seem to have had a successful response, while the majority had a failed response. The Phase 1 Trial was closed, with no follow-up studies done to our knowledge since we have never received any follow-up requests from Dana Farber, and there are apparently no plans for a Phase 2 Trial, which is perplexing if the Trial was deemed to be at least successful for some patients. It would be interesting to know what type of ASPS the patients who responded had, versus those who didn't respond, since there are apparently two different types of ASPS, Type One and Type Two as identified by researcher Dr. David Vistica. I remember that during the preliminary planning four years ago for the now inexplicably abandoned Memorial Sloan Kettering Immunotherapy Peptide Vaccine, that some mention was made of the fact that eligibility for the Clinical Trial would be based on what type of ASPS the patient had. Hopefully the clear cell carcinoma patient and Anthony Olsen will continue to have disease stabilization, and some research will be done by Dana Farber to determine the cause for their significantly more successful response than that of the other GVAX Clinical Trial patients, and then a more effective vaccine can be developed which will be effective for all ASPS patients.
With special caring thoughts and continued Hope,
Bonni Hess
I was very happy to read the entry on the Homepage from the parent of a clear cell carcinoma patient regarding his son's apparent successful response to the GVAX Immunotherapy Vaccine. It was so kind of the parent to share the information, and it is so wonderful to hear that the GVAX seems to have been effective in stabilizing the progression of his son's disease for two years, as also appears to have happened with ASPS patient Anthony Olsen. Heartbreakingly, this has not been the experience of several other ASPS patients who participated in the Clinical Trial who all experienced extensive and even aggressive post Clinical Trial disease progression, including our daughter Brittany. I don't understand why more follow-up isn't being done by the Dana Farber GVAX research team to try to determine why a few patients seem to have had a successful response, while the majority had a failed response. The Phase 1 Trial was closed, with no follow-up studies done to our knowledge since we have never received any follow-up requests from Dana Farber, and there are apparently no plans for a Phase 2 Trial, which is perplexing if the Trial was deemed to be at least successful for some patients. It would be interesting to know what type of ASPS the patients who responded had, versus those who didn't respond, since there are apparently two different types of ASPS, Type One and Type Two as identified by researcher Dr. David Vistica. I remember that during the preliminary planning four years ago for the now inexplicably abandoned Memorial Sloan Kettering Immunotherapy Peptide Vaccine, that some mention was made of the fact that eligibility for the Clinical Trial would be based on what type of ASPS the patient had. Hopefully the clear cell carcinoma patient and Anthony Olsen will continue to have disease stabilization, and some research will be done by Dana Farber to determine the cause for their significantly more successful response than that of the other GVAX Clinical Trial patients, and then a more effective vaccine can be developed which will be effective for all ASPS patients.
With special caring thoughts and continued Hope,
Bonni Hess