Helical CT, Benign & Malignant Lung Nodules
Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 5:59 am
I don't know whether this would help anybody, but we also considered this paper in our thinking about our daughter's lung nodules.
At Seattle Childrens, our daughter has Helical Chest CTs - these are remarkably quick as well as show much more dramatic detail than conventional chest CTs. When we went back for a higher resolution scan, they performed 1 mm slices (fine detail).
This paper showed how common benign nodules were picked up among children with known primary tumors. You can access the entire paper free. This is not an ASPS paper, but ASPS is a solid tumor. It can also point to the difficulty of simply excising every pulmonary nodule that is detected. Are the benign nodules unrelated? Or are they evidence of small metastases that are being successfully eliminated by the immune system?
http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/conte ... /239/2/514
In our daughter's case, she had 3 nodules 1.5-2.5 mm. 2 had definite calcifications so were thought to be benign. The third was indeterminate. We are still awaiting Dana Farber's Tumor Board meeting, but we are leaning toward a short course of SUTENT (e.g. 2 months) to attempt to reduce the size of the primary. We would also think this could help scavenge small metastases that are just starting to grow elsewhere in her body.
At Seattle Childrens, our daughter has Helical Chest CTs - these are remarkably quick as well as show much more dramatic detail than conventional chest CTs. When we went back for a higher resolution scan, they performed 1 mm slices (fine detail).
This paper showed how common benign nodules were picked up among children with known primary tumors. You can access the entire paper free. This is not an ASPS paper, but ASPS is a solid tumor. It can also point to the difficulty of simply excising every pulmonary nodule that is detected. Are the benign nodules unrelated? Or are they evidence of small metastases that are being successfully eliminated by the immune system?
http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/conte ... /239/2/514
In our daughter's case, she had 3 nodules 1.5-2.5 mm. 2 had definite calcifications so were thought to be benign. The third was indeterminate. We are still awaiting Dana Farber's Tumor Board meeting, but we are leaning toward a short course of SUTENT (e.g. 2 months) to attempt to reduce the size of the primary. We would also think this could help scavenge small metastases that are just starting to grow elsewhere in her body.